For Recovery

One product, done to the standard the category should have had all along. Aram Creatine Gummies carry 1000mg of creatine monohydrate per gummy, 60 to a bottle, in pineapple or strawberry — both sugar-free. Three gummies is the daily serving: a full 3g of creatine monohydrate, counted rather than scooped, with no shaker and no chalky residue. Every batch is assayed by an independent laboratory for actual creatine content against the label, and the certificate is published on our Lab Reports page.

Daily, including rest days — that's the entire protocol. Creatine isn't a pre-workout to be timed around sessions; it's a daily supplement, and the 3g intake is what the authorised claim is conditional on. Three gummies with breakfast, or after training, or whenever they'll reliably happen. No loading phase is required.

Treat the stated intake as a ceiling, not a target to beat. Food supplement rules apply as everywhere in the range: varied diet first, and a word with your GP if you're on medication.

Because the creatine gummy category flunked its own test. Independent laboratory testing in the UK found gummies containing far less creatine than labelled — bad enough that consumer experts warned shoppers off the format. The fix isn't better marketing; it's verification. Every Aram batch is assayed independently for actual creatine content, and you can read the certificate for your batch number before you take a single gummy.

One more piece of honesty, since this page is called Recovery: the UK's authorised creatine claim — quoted at the top of this page — covers physical performance in successive short bursts of short-term, high-intensity exercise, with the beneficial effect obtained at a daily intake of 3g. It doesn't mention recovery, muscle growth or strength, and so neither do we. "For Recovery" is where this product sits in your week — the post-training slot, the gym-bag pocket — not a smuggled promise. We'd rather name a shelf honestly than write a claim nobody licensed. If that plainness reads oddly next to the rest of the category, we'd gently suggest the category is the odd one — and that a published assay beats an unpublished adjective every time.